<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Trench Reynolds - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-cb7028d4" type="application/json"/><link>http://trench-reynolds.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://trench-reynolds.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:57:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pooch screwing rampant on craigslist</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/04/02/pooch-screwing-rampant-on-craigslist/#comment-530674013</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You're missing my point which is why isn't PETA and the Humane Society, etc. going after craigslist for advertising what is basically animal abuse?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:57:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pooch screwing rampant on craigslist</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/04/02/pooch-screwing-rampant-on-craigslist/#comment-530605051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh good. I am so glad PETA wrote those letters, the Humane Society put out a pamphlet, and Flori-duh is considering making beastiality illegal (figures it isnt already). That is going to help a lot. I think Trench had it right when he said they weren't doing anything. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sothischimpwalksintoabar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:22:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pooch screwing rampant on craigslist</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/04/02/pooch-screwing-rampant-on-craigslist/#comment-530409789</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"But the real question is where are all the animal protection groups on this issue. Where’s the ASPCA, the Humane Society and even *spit* PETA? Nowhere to be found as far as I know."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I really hope you're kidding, as a simple Google search yields several articles speaking out on the issues with bestiality's presence.  Here are just a few links to articles about this very issue.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wsfa.com/Global/story.asp?S=4992102" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wsfa.com/Global/sto...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://terry-9.newsvine.com/_news/2011/12/09/9325671-peta-rebukes-white-house-for-flippantly-dismissing-question-on-senates-vote-to-legalize-bestiality-in-military" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://terry-9.newsvine.com/_n...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.humanesociety.org/assets/pdfs/abuse/first_strike.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.humanesociety.org/a...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.humanesociety.org/news/press_releases/2009/04/florida_humane_lobby_day_040209.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.humanesociety.org/n...&lt;/a&gt; Before making such an allegation degrading organizations supporting animal welfare, do your research, bro.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We get letters: Some of us want to be on backpage.</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/13/we-get-letters-some-of-us-want-to-be-on-backpage/#comment-529272051</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Totally agree with you, Trench.  While I do have some sympathy for a person who honestly believes that she can do nothing but sell herself to get by (I find that so sad), just because you have reasons for making the choices you do, doesn't make it right.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To the email writer:  You really need to look into getting yourself professional help.  I'm not being bitchy or nasty, but I know from experience how feelings of self-worth and poor decision making go hand in hand.  I take from your letter that you are not happy with your situation, so why not start changing it?  A  good way to start is by finding someone to help you make sense of all the bullshit that is effecting your life.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jj</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:43:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic of the Week: Deadpool #54</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/13/comic-of-the-week-deadpool-54/#comment-528523113</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Possibly, but maybe not in the way most people think. It's supposed to be an origins story (and since very few people know the origins of Deadpool, on actually worth telling), he's going to be without the scars for maybe half the film. This could sort of give them something to go on. Then again, that was a while ago. Deadpool fans just might have to compromise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've heard it said that Deadpool is coming out in 2014. At that time, I expect his powers to be restored. If his face gets messed up along with it or not, we'll have our answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Shafer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 11:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic of the Week: Deadpool #54</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/13/comic-of-the-week-deadpool-54/#comment-528164397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if his new look has anything to do with the proposed movie. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comic of the Week: Deadpool #54</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/13/comic-of-the-week-deadpool-54/#comment-528160543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's certainly will be divisive among the fanbase, but overall I think it was just about the only thing he could have done to get Deadpool out of his rut.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Shafer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 20:30:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finally someone gets jail time in Victoria Lindsay beating</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2009/03/20/finally-someone-gets-jail-time-in-victoria-lindsay-beating/#comment-527669179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So fucken true those bitches hurt Victoria an got away Scott free that's wring I hope Victoria does something 20times worse &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aprilmurray1210</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 02:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Capano dies in prison</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2011/09/20/tom-capano-dies-in-prison/#comment-527525356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So Capano's brother just made up the story about him and Capano dumping Ann Marie's body off of the boat and then shooting the ice cooler full of holes when it wouldn't sink?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 20:02:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Capano dies in prison</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2011/09/20/tom-capano-dies-in-prison/#comment-527459680</link><description>&lt;p&gt;(Continued from part one of Belladonna)Americans think when someone gets married they are totally responsible to give there total life to the one that they are married to,well it takes two to tango,meaning,the other partner has to know when to trow in the towel.give it a rest,most people in this country are killing each other because they are unhappily &lt;a href="http://married.is" rel="nofollow"&gt;married.is&lt;/a&gt; that better than cheating?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Belladonna1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tom Capano dies in prison</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2011/09/20/tom-capano-dies-in-prison/#comment-527452068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are u sure that this did not happen the way capano said ,about Debra mcIntyre.truth is stranger than fiction u know,and u were not there,so who are u guys to judge.think about it.i am extremely intelligent,and I think he was telling the truth.why do Americans get so angry about someone comitting adultery.you believe that if someone gets married in this country they should be condemed&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Belladonna1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:07:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-527279650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks. Too much hysterics drives the internet these days. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:39:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Liz McDougall is a corporate sellout</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/08/liz-mcdougall-is-a-corporate-sellout/#comment-527275826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm going to call it too:  WHORE!  LIZ IS A WHORE!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ginger_Again</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:32:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-527273479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for enlightening me about the state of NC.  I didn't have any real preconceived notions about the state other than they have a kick-ass basketball team at Duke and that one of the best trauma surgeons I have ever know was educated at Duke.  I thought my neighboring Silicon Valley was the end all be all of technology.  Never would have known Raleigh was a technology giant in it's own right.  Also, you are absolutely right, Amendment One will be ruled as unconstitutional.  One of the things I have always enjoyed about your posts is you stick to the facts.  Keep it up!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ginger_Again</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 12:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PA man caught cranking it to juveniles on MyYearbook</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/04/22/pa-man-caught-cranking-it-to-juveniles-on-myyearbook/#comment-525979275</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a typical pedo argument. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:21:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PA man caught cranking it to juveniles on MyYearbook</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/04/22/pa-man-caught-cranking-it-to-juveniles-on-myyearbook/#comment-525978845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alot of the underage girls on myyearbook pose in their underware begging to be raped look at most of the girls pics and charge em with child porn&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ccook123865</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 22:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-525959349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't doubt what you say but I don't follow politics closely anymore. If this is the lengths people (on both sides of the aisle) go to in order to further their agenda then it's no wonder the country is screwed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:45:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dave Cullen: Columbine Mythbuster</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2010/10/19/dave-cullen-columbine-mythbuster/#comment-525913199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's strange because I can produce the names of the kids that Harris and Klebold bullied long before Columbine. There's documented evidence of it. So how come there's no documented evidence of the names of their supposed bullies? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And all the victims' families think so? Really? Do you know them all or do you just stalk them?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:22:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-525014638</link><description>&lt;p&gt; But the reaction is based on that recent story of the Kentucky Church getting sued no doubt. And as I tell my gay friends the gay left purposefully puts people like Dan Savage  out front to cause rifts with the Christians and such. Think about it, just before this vote Dan Savage is in the national news insulting the Bible, a church in Kentucky is being sued etc. Then Obama comes out to support gay marriage ... after the vote? Not to be Alex Jonesian but c'mon. Set up. The hard left supports regimes in the Middle East and Latin America that kills gays, they aren't seriously trying to pass gay marriage in NC&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I could get civil unions passed in SC next year if I wanted to by crafting  bill with religious protections and running a campaign that points out marriage would turn gays conservative. But the marriage groups don't want gays wed they want gays marginalized so they are a dependable voting block. Sans marriage most gays are Republican - believing in individual liberty, self defense and economic freedom. Putting these things on the ballot then torpedoing them is the left's way to keep gays on the reservation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dig it, prop 8 happened because the same people who wanted marriage encouraged massive Catholic Latino and Black turn out. Then they blamed it on Mormons even though exit polls showed is was the Latino and Black vote that stopped the marriage. If Obama came out with his statement before yesterday, if Dan Savage wasn't put och there by the media, if the left didn't attack that church in KY, if the bill included religious exemptions wouldn't things have been different?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobTaylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:24:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-524991192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;While I agree with what you say we both know that yesterday had nothing to do with lawsuits. It was pure knee jerk reaction. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Trench on the NC gay marriage ban</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2012/05/09/trench-on-the-nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-524984344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dick Cheney came out on support of gay marriage in 2008, just sayin'&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But seriously, the only problem with the gay marriage bills as written by dems is that invariably give trial lawyers the ability to sue people for not wanting to be involved. When I was in CT there was a case in Mass where a lesbian tried to hire a guy she knew to be a born again to be her wedding photog - didn't tell him it was a gay marriage. He backed out but she sued and he lost his business. You know I'm not a Christian but you can't create equality by putting together bills that force Christians, Muslims and Jews to participate in something they think will send them to hell. Put a bill together that protects religious folks from lawsuits for not being involved and you'll get  60% or Republicans every time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RobTaylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:52:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dave Cullen: Columbine Mythbuster</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2010/10/19/dave-cullen-columbine-mythbuster/#comment-522507087</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As I was saying I doubt the Harris or klebold families are interested in suing everyone who gets facts about their sons wrong for slander... With all the literature about them out there that would be tiresome and tedious not to mention probably torturous to bring back those memories when it's not necessary&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charcar08</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:14:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dave Cullen: Columbine Mythbuster</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2010/10/19/dave-cullen-columbine-mythbuster/#comment-522505927</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like they just said, no one is going to come out and admit they are the ones who bullied them. Research "the ketchup incident" when ketchup covered tampons were hurled at them in the cafeteria. And read Daniel rourbough's father's opinion on Dave Cullen and about why Oprah decided to cancel having him on her show. Anyways, they were bullied, and a lot of what Cullen wrote was bullshit. All the families of the victims think so, and I'd say they are a pretty great source. I don't think the Harris' or Klebold's are interested&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Charcar08</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:10:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN on the West Memphis 3</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2009/12/29/cnn-on-the-west-memphis-3/#comment-521305609</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Please. Did you copy and paste that from &lt;a href="http://WM3.org?" rel="nofollow"&gt;WM3.org?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Paid experts testified that the wounds were caused by animals. That is hardly considered proof. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I will agree with you that most children are killed by someone they know but not all. Have you never heard of a thrill kill? That's what this was. They killed for the sake of killing. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way do you consider the Arkansas Supreme Court to be southern conservatives hicks who are part of the Christian ol boy network? Because that's who upheld their convictions. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Trench Reynolds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:39:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CNN on the West Memphis 3</title><link>http://trenchreynolds.me/2009/12/29/cnn-on-the-west-memphis-3/#comment-520845712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Listen, the injuries to the young boys that put&lt;br&gt;the WM3 in prison were proven to be created by animals, and not knife wounds as&lt;br&gt;was presented by the prosecution, that they (WM3) cut the boys and drank their&lt;br&gt;blood. Their whole case was based on that. Most children are murdered by&lt;br&gt;someone they know…read some forensic and profiler books before you spout out&lt;br&gt;your un professional opinion. Now that the good-ol-bible-thumping-christian-boy&lt;br&gt;network has been exposed for what they are…witch hunters who ignore science and&lt;br&gt;see devils hiding around every corner. Only in the hick, conservative south&lt;br&gt;could this happen in this day and age.      &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Video_guy2009</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 05:53:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
